There isn’t enough DNA for sequential translation or origin (rephrase)
There isn’t enough DNA to direct human development on a one-for-one base pair to outcome basis. In other words, unlike as with a recipe where one instruction leads to one action, a small set of DNA must lead to a much larger set of decisions/actions/outcomes. Even if every base pair in DNA was a useful, individual, instruction, the ratio of DNA to outcomes is at least 1:1000. There are way too many specific relationships that must be specified in human development, ranging from the body plan to arrangement of individual neurons and synapses.

Algorithmic expansion of DNA
Algorithmic processing, or something similar, must take a small section of DNA and expand it into a much larger set of instructions. There are way too

Direct instructions would require a much larger amount of DNA

The nucleus, and potentially cell, could not hold/manage the amount of DNA necessary for direct instructions

Cell division would take much longer with direct translation

Longer cell division could extend gestation period beyond maternal life span

Longer cell division would prevent body from timely repairs or replacement of lost cells (such as red blood)

Larger cells would dramatically alter surface area to volume ratio, potentially making it unable to function (because could exchange enough via membrane)

Larger cells wouldn’t have the resolution/ needed for us to function as we do (size of cell relative to action it is performing

Distance might be too great in large cell for functions, processes, reactions, transports and molecules to traverse.

Cell size is tuned by design (ratio

Saying something wouldn’t work any other way is only an explanation for what doesn’t exist. It isn’t an explanation for why or how something does.

Idea that evolution stores up genes for when they are needed counters natural selection (for how they came about) and implies teleology (and corresponding agent)

How things could have gone extinct, how new species could have arisen (and appeared “natural”)

Counter-intuitive, counter-Darwinian, human characteristics

Low, uncertain fertility not tied to seasons (vs. clear indication of female’s state and “one and done”)

Single births vs. litters

Slow growth

Slow maturity

Extended period of defenselessness and high-dependency

“thoughts” embedded in, or expressed in, cell

Cell tuning

Why we shouldn’t have perfect memory, recall including with sensations

Things can’t argue:
1) It’s that way because it wouldn’t work any other

Teleology through multiple steps that have no other purpose nor selectability

Engineered to be social, grow, love, reach for God